«

»

May 30

Defending Women’s Health in Texas

Think about Planned Parenthood. What are the first things that come to mind? Women’s health? Pro-choice activism? Legal cases? Abortion? All these words apply to the Planned Parenthood organization, but they don’t capture the entire scope of what it does. The organization has existed for more than 90 years but there are still lots of misconceptions about what they do and why they do it. That is unfortunate for the organization itself. But it’s worse when those misconceptions result in state governments trying to remove funding from the organization, hurting the women who rely on Planned Parenthood in the process.

The issues going on in Texas right now perfectly illustrate what I mean. Last year, the Texas state legislature passed a law banning Planned Parenthood from the Medicaid Women’s Health Program. This was a huge blow to the clinics in Texas because previously the federal government would pay $9 for every $1 the state spent, which amounted to about $35 million in funding. When the law takes effect Planned Parenthood clinics probably won’t be able to stay open, which will leave thousands of women in need of new health care service. So Texas women are protesting this proposal and have organized into a group called Don’t Mess with Texas Women. They don’t want to give up their health coverage and don’t believe they should have to. Why should they be forced to go to new state funded clinics when they already have great care with Planned Parenthood. When women go to a Planned Parenthood clinic they know they are entering a clean, safe environment, but they won’t know what to expect from these new clinics that the state is promoting or even that they’ll have access to them. It’s not fair that women should be forced to change health care clinics and lose coverage in the immediate future because the state has decided it doesn’t agree with some of Planned Parenthood’s policies.

Given the amount of money the state stands to lose, the potential harm done to women, and the wide spread protests, it seems crazy that the Texas legislature would take this drastic step to end funding. But I’m sure you’ve already guessed what the real motivation behind the law is: abortion. The legislature decided they didn’t want any state money going towards clinics that provide abortions. Even though only some Planned Parenthood clinics provide abortions, ALL clinics in Texas are losing their funding. In reality, they cover all sorts of health services from contraception, STI and STD testing, cancer screening, and yes, sometimes abortions. But abortions only represent 3% of the services they provide. Many people just assume that all Planned Parenthood does is provide abortions for women because of the news coverage it receives or the stories they hear. However, the facts show that this isn’t the case and there is no way state officials don’t have that information. In spite of all that, Texas is still insisting on removing all funding from the organization as a protest against abortions.

I’m not arguing for or against the validity, legality or morality of having an abortion. That is for someone else other than me to decide. But I am arguing that all women have the right to the care that Planned Parenthood provides. When it is sometimes the only option for safe health care for a woman how can officials reasonably argue that funding should be removed? The important thing is that women get the healthcare they need and deserve without politicizing the issue and distorting all the good Planned Parenthood does. In an attempt to fix this wrong, Planned Parenthood challenged the Texas law and the case has been making its way through the Appeals Court circuit. Unfortunately, if the law is overturned and the state is forced to include Planned Parenthood in its Women’s Health Program, Texas officials have stated that they will shut down the program all together rather than contribute the mandatory funds. This would leave thousands of women without access to proper health care. For the sake of Texas women I hope officials do not follow through with their plan if the court decides against them. They need to listen to the women of Don’t Mess with Texas Women and protect their female residents by continuing funding for Planned Parenthood.

1 comment

  1. Sally Pope

    It’s so unfortunate how this is going to affect women of lower socio-economic status, especially immigrant women. Often these women only have access to low-cost reproductive health services from providers like Planned Parenthood. If these women are denied access to contraception or methods to abort unwanted children this has a lot of potential implications. the myth of women using abortion as a means of contraception has been unproven time and time again and many women the do have abortions of unwanted children is because they already have other children, are of lower income, and thus do not have the resources to provide for another child. More families already struggling to provide will become even more financially burdened. What kind of a burden does this mean for the states and taxpayers? Who is going to foot the bill for Medicaid and emergency care hospital bills?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*